A cryptocurrency donation initially valued at $200,000 in 2018 has escalated into a $33 million political and ethical controversy in Malta. The funds, pledged by Binance and its users to the Malta Community Chest Fund (MCCF) for terminally ill cancer patients, have remained untouched due to a dispute over how they should be administered.
The Genesis of the Donation
In 2018, Binance, then the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, partnered with the MCCF to raise funds for cancer patients in Malta. The campaign collected approximately 30,644 BNB tokens, which were worth about $200,000 at the time. However, as the value of BNB surged, the donation’s worth increased, reaching approximately $33 million by 2025.
TradingView
The Dispute Unfolds
The controversy centers on the method of distributing the funds. Binance insisted that the donations be transferred directly to patients’ crypto wallets to ensure transparency and efficiency. However, the MCCF refused to share patient information, citing concerns over data privacy and the integrity of the charity’s operations. This disagreement led to a legal stalemate, with the funds remaining dormant in a digital wallet.
Times of Malta
Political Divisions Emerge
The issue has divided Malta’s political landscape. President Myriam Spiteri Debono labeled the donation a “bogus donation,” emphasizing the importance of maintaining the MCCF’s reputation and adhering to legal standards. Conversely, Prime Minister Robert Abela urged the MCCF to reconsider its stance, expressing concern over the potential loss of substantial funds that could benefit cancer patients. Finance Minister Clyde Caruana also supported the MCCF’s decision, aligning with the President’s position.
Times of Malta
Ethical and Legal Considerations
The debate raises significant ethical and legal questions. Critics argue that accepting funds from a company with a controversial legal history could tarnish the MCCF’s reputation. Binance has faced legal challenges, including a $4.3 billion fine for failing to report suspicious transactions and a money laundering conviction for its founder, Changpeng Zhao.
Wikipedia
The Stalemate Continues
As of October 2025, the $33 million remains unclaimed, with no resolution in sight. The MCCF continues to uphold its decision, while Binance maintains its commitment to ensuring the funds are used for their intended purpose in Malta. The situation highlights the complexities of integrating cryptocurrency donations into traditional charitable frameworks and the challenges of balancing innovation with regulatory compliance.
Conclusion
The Binance-Malta charity dispute underscores the evolving intersection of digital finance and philanthropy. While the potential benefits of cryptocurrency donations are evident, the challenges they present—particularly regarding transparency, data privacy, and legal compliance—must be carefully navigated. As Malta grapples with this issue, it serves as a case study for other nations considering similar initiatives.
